Never trust a rich man when he offers you a truth Black 47
What They Are Saying About OD
Brilliant commentary, Orange - cydoniaquest
| Author | Comment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Orange Duke |
Riddle Me This Nimfonly |
Lead | |||||||
|
What are the odds that shortly after you started posting here regularly a brand new poster with a brand new ID would also start posting here? A poster who shares all your petty bigotries and opinions, hates everyone you hate, loves everyone you love and only posts on this board? Im fooled, really I am.
-----------------------------------
Never trust a rich man when he offers you a truth Black 47 What They Are Saying About OD Brilliant commentary, Orange - cydoniaquest |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
God works in mysterious ways, doesn't He? | ||||||||
|
Now quit whining and go get Doohickey to confirm my word for you.
Or just get Daddy to pay for Doohickey's time, since obviously you're either (a) too stinking lazy to get off your fat arse to confirm what I've been telling you (just like all the other atheists who refuse to do the 54 Day Rosary Irresistable Novena Petition), or (b) you're just on Doohickey's wrong side (just like you're on the wrong side of most everybody else from the evidence of your sig) and you need a third party (Big Bad Attorney Daddy) to pay for the copious exposures of your rampant fallacies. Or has Doohickey, just like Vamp complains, simply lost his IT touch and hasn't been keeping up with all the changes in ISP revelations? Left-wing sloth and gluttony does that to a character, so has the IT business evolved beyond the capacities of Doohickey's skills and talents and *THAT'S* why you can't confirm what I'm telling you? |
|||||||||
if only we all cared |
Re: God works in mysterious ways, doesn't He? | ||||||||
|
You know Peter, I have the impression that OD is a homosexual Jew.
|
|||||||||
peter1589 |
We can only hope! | ||||||||
|
God help the woman who comes under his bulk of *his* hatred.
|
|||||||||
tracyanne |
Re: God works in mysterious ways, doesn't He? | ||||||||
|
Comming from the likes of you iowac that is one hell of a compliment.
|
|||||||||
The Orange Duke |
I have the impression that OD is a homosexual Jew. | ||||||||
|
Yes, but then you have that impression about everyone, so that doesnt mean very much, does it? Care to guess why you have given more evidence that you are just another Nimbo?
-----------------------------------
Never trust a rich man when he offers you a truth Black 47 What They Are Saying About OD Brilliant commentary, Orange - cydoniaquest |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
You think the public is outraged against Catholic ... | ||||||||
|
priests due to the "pedophile" allegations?
Read this to find out some interesting warfare conducted against the Church a couple of centuries ago. Still it stands! www.redemptorists.com/canada/our_saints/clement.htm |
|||||||||
tracyanne |
Re: You think the public is outraged against Catholic ... | ||||||||
Quote: Just more religionist propaganda.
|
|||||||||
peter1589 |
Propoganda? | ||||||||
|
Oh, yeah, sorry, I forgot. A 2,000 year old institution of COURSE is a propaganda machine, and not a vast library of historical documentation, isn't it? Nobody wants to get into the Vatican library nowadays for research, do they?
Except people like Hume's brother or brother-in-law (I forget which) who was going there to open the world's eyes about Catholic sins or some such and then was never heard about again. |
|||||||||
tracyanne |
Re: Propoganda? | ||||||||
Quote: Yes this not quite 2000 year old institutionis indeed a propaganda machine with a long history of lying for god. The assertion that the the Roman Catholic Church is 2000 years old is one of those lies. Another lie that the Roman Catholic church, among other Christian denominations, has passed on to us is the lie that the Jesus of the Christian Bible was a real person. Quote: I suspect that quite a number of people would like to get into the Vatican library. If the full library were made available to skeptics in the same manner it is made available to the trusted members of the propaganda machine, we might have some interesting revelations.
|
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
the problem with your position | ||||||||
|
is that either the church you support is rotten to the core, practicing child abuse & covering it up etc.
Or you can't trust that any priest in the church you support is for real, they may actually be part of a diabolical conspiracy. You won't be able to tell. This could go right to the top as well. After all, when talking about deceit, who did Machiavelli give as an example? A Pope! Quote: A pretty horny dilemma you've created for yourself Nimbo. |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
So it would seem, eh? | ||||||||
|
Let me quote Fr. Corapi for you, regarding the crisis of which you speak, priestly "paedophilia":
Quote: Hence the state of the Church today. But, never forget, the Church on earth is not the Church Triumphant, that ones in heaven. The Church on earth is the Church Militant, and where theres war, theres wounded and killed. The Cross, in other words. No pain, no gain. No cross, no glory. Its that simple. Now, as for Alexander VI, sure there are sinners in the Church! What did you expect, perfection on earth? No, the Church has MEN in leadership and as servants. Look at me! Look at yourself! Who's "perfect"? No one, but God. Otherwise, why the Sacrament of Reconciliation, Confession?? If we were perfect, why would we need *that*?? The premise is ridiculous, obviously, don't you agree, that the Church can be anything less than battered and beaten and assaulted from within and without. Just read AA-1025 (Amazon.com) if you want to see the history of atheism's attempts to destroy it, and where much of today's problems also have their genesis. |
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
you see what I'm driving at though | ||||||||
|
it's your relationship to the other members of the RC church. And with regards the 'sinners ' in the church, I was talking specifically about the capacity for deceit, a capacity displayed by the child abusers, and by those who covered it up. (The topic of Ch 18 of 'The Prince ' which I quoted from earlier. ) How can you know that anyone in the RC church, right up to the top of the tree, is a straight shooter - and if you can't, given the facts of the matter - then what does that mean for your own personal relationships with the other members of your church?
(I'm really not interested in whether priest x or priest y got a particular job depending on whether they thought women should also be priests. Not the point, man. ) |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
The faggots who entered the priesthood . . . | ||||||||
|
are REALLY obvious about it.
Remember, I was in show business and they were in my face DAILY. I've met numerous gay priests, many of whom were child molesters and a few of whom seemed to be able to almost keep their homosexual passions in complete check. I've seen it all along the way since the 1970's when I first became familiar with the Church. Then I was a complete pagan worldling, a sinner who found being "politically correct" pragmatically practical toward my own hedonistic ends. So they didn't bother me then. Now, having heard the voice of hell which God has promised me will be mine unless I convert and pray, fast and do penance, I have a much different viewpoint, as you well know. So, I must disagree with your assertion that "How can you know that anyone in the RC church, right up to the top of the tree, is a straight shooter - and if you can't, given the facts of the matter - then what does that mean for your own personal relationships with the other members of your church?" What it means ultimately is that those who are without sin must cast the first stone. As much as I am incensed by the incredible damage and imposition of monetary sanctions against none other than the congregations who support the church with their alms and sacrifical giving which is the result of all this radical feminist religious direction of the seminary councils, it's just one more thing we have to deal with. The point is, we already know who wins the battle. Now we just have to go through the fight. There are some who definitely disagree with me. Very intelligent people, too. Take a look at this: Quote: Here, a very intelligent attorney can't see the fact that his catechism taught him this is the CHURCH MILITANT and that there will be INCREDIBLE battles to be fought, a narrow path to tread, and few there are who will find it. He ignores the historic strategic truths of Fifth Column infiltration of the forces of evil which will desperatly seek to destroy the institution from the inside out. This is a vivid, profound and heinous battle which the Church is in. Up against rampant Liberalism, hedonism, materialism and all the rampant vices propogated by the modern media through all its rampant channels, and being eaten away from the inside by villians in priestly garb seeking a free ride and all the young booty they can consume, what is the end result hoped for? Simply this: the destruction of the priesthood so there is no valid Eucharist and the souls of the faithful will never receive the heavenly nourishment so utterly necessary for final salvation [John 6]. Isn't that profound?? Isn't it amazing how well the evil one's scheme is progressing, if viewed in *that* light? |
|||||||||
tracyanne |
Here is another of your lies | ||||||||
Quote: In which case they were not Homosexual, they were paedophiles. We keep getting this dishonest arguement from you that Homosexuals are Paedophiles. |
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
Re: | ||||||||
Quote: Shut the fuck up then! You keep telling us you're a big old sinner, after all. Or - why not actually address the matter before you and tell us how you can trust anyone in your church, since you can't tell who might be a member of this 'fifth column ' you keep going on about. |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
How does homosexual rape deny homosexuality? | ||||||||
|
Seriously, traceyanne, cognitive disonance is your trademark. And the VAST number of incidents were *NOT* "paedophilia," but directed against boys the average age of 17.
17 year olds are VERY sexually oriented, even moreso today due to the liberal agenda of sexual "education" in public schools tragically devoid of the moral imperative of religion. It's why Catholic schools are bursting at the seams. Back in the '60's I knew TONS of experienced teens in my high school and in others where I had friends all over the city. My first orgy was when I was 16 and one girl (who had been getting raped regularly by her father at that point, although I was not cognizant of it) had a bunch of friends over when her parents went away for a couple of days. What an eye-opener that was. Was I a victim of paedophilia?? No, I was a zealous advocate of carnal explosion and here was more poontang available than ever had I imagined were possible. It laid the game plan for decades thereafter. Until God brought me at least 10% of the way to my senses proving to me the reality of the Hell of the Bible in no uncertain terms. During the same period I was a student producer of a WQED TV nationally broadcast television program called "The Place," and I got to know a ton of other like-minded kids from all over the city. We were hot! And several of them were gay, and they made no bones about their sexual agenda and how open they were to all comers. Can you imagine the easy pickings these kids (and some older post-adolescents as well) were for what you term "paedophilia?" And willingly so, yes, QUITE willingly so! There was one local dancer, a black guy named "Cocoa" who was a magnificent physical specimen. He enjoyed inviting a lot of boys my age into the woods for gang blow jobs. About six of these guys decided they would have some fun and "roll" Cocoa for his money. Cocoa kicked *ALL* their butts and had a great, uproarious time doing it as well. Were they victims, or willing, if utterly misguided (as all youth are), partners?? |
|||||||||
peter1589 |
I just told you. Read, dude, READ!! | ||||||||
|
I *KNOW* a faggot when I see one. I can pick them out unerringly.
And I also know that life demands prudence, but also that I will be called before God to account for my witness. Now, again, read your own words and see if you can't answer your own question. I'll give you a hint at the end: Quote: Which imperative shall I obey, master? Do you want me to STFU or reanswer for yet a third time what already was in the earlier post? |
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
Re: | ||||||||
Quote: But do you know someone who serves Satan when you see one? Do you know a priest who is covering up for another Satanic 'Fifth Columnist ' when you see one? How can you trust any member of your church - right to the very top, the guy with the strange hat? How can you be sure that any priest you encounter isn't in the employ of the devil ("the deceiver of the whole world" ) which you believe in? Once again: when Machiavelli wanted to give an example of someone who was 'a great pretender and dissembler ' he pointed to ... a Pope. Quote: |
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
Nimbologic | ||||||||
|
According to you, only people who are without a sin should 'cast stones ' at others who are now sinning away. You spend much of your time railing against grown men who have done gay stuff.
Quote: Quote: You still won't say if you've been faithful to your wife. Hmmm ... According to you, people should not 'cast stones ' if they too are sinners, so: either shut up about gay sex you monomaniac ... or 'fess up! |
|||||||||
GoatBoy36 |
you know, | ||||||||
|
I wondered if perhaps Nimbo had changed his ways a little bit and could engage in reasonable conversation, but it seems that he's still obsessed with grown men bumming one another, & just can't change the record.
I'm trying to get on to another topic, namely the human capacity for deception, maybe even get a little bit of history going there (Alexander VI, Cesare Borgia etc. ) but it appears that all Nimbo wants to talk about is gayness. Unfortunately for Nimbo, that's a topic I'm just not all that interested in. Might as well talk about toasters, or how to slate a roof. So I'll say just now that if the topic of conversation doesn't alter, I'm going off to do other things. (I did also try to change the whole 'music is satan worshipping ' thing of Nimbo's into a discussion of artists like Billy Joe Shaver but that was no go as well. ) I'm currently reading this interesting wee book, on top of my other coursework, so I've enough to be getting on with, like. |
|||||||||